Rename misleading label

We use this code path when we require the same extension twice, so it's
not necessarily about the feature being statically linked. Removing this
code when there is no statically linked extensions leads to breakage.
This commit is contained in:
Alan Wu 2022-11-18 19:42:24 -05:00
parent 7f269a3c2d
commit 5c505f4a48

6
load.c
View File

@ -1028,13 +1028,13 @@ search_required(rb_vm_t *vm, VALUE fname, volatile VALUE *path, feature_func rb_
switch (type) {
case 0:
if (ft)
goto statically_linked;
goto feature_present;
ftptr = RSTRING_PTR(tmp);
return rb_feature_p(vm, ftptr, 0, FALSE, TRUE, 0);
default:
if (ft) {
goto statically_linked;
goto feature_present;
}
/* fall through */
case 1:
@ -1045,7 +1045,7 @@ search_required(rb_vm_t *vm, VALUE fname, volatile VALUE *path, feature_func rb_
}
return type ? 's' : 'r';
statically_linked:
feature_present:
if (loading) *path = rb_filesystem_str_new_cstr(loading);
return ft;
}