Optimize Range#bsearch by reducing the number of Integer#+ calls

range.c

@@ -649,27 +649,30 @@ bsearch_integer_range(VALUE beg, VALUE end, int excl)
 
     VALUE low = rb_to_int(beg);
     VALUE high = rb_to_int(end);
-    VALUE mid, org_high;
+    VALUE mid;
     ID id_div;
     CONST_ID(id_div, "div");
 
-    if (excl) high = rb_funcall(high, '-', 1, INT2FIX(1));
+    if (!excl) high = rb_funcall(high, '+', 1, INT2FIX(1));
-    org_high = high;
+    low = rb_funcall(low, '-', 1, INT2FIX(1));
 
-    while (rb_cmpint(rb_funcall(low, id_cmp, 1, high), low, high) < 0) {
+    /*
-        mid = rb_funcall(rb_funcall(high, '+', 1, low), id_div, 1, INT2FIX(2));
+     * This loop must continue while low + 1 < high.
+     * Instead of checking low + 1 < high, check low < mid, where mid = (low + high) / 2.
+     * This is to avoid the cost of calculating low + 1 on each iteration.
+     * Note that this condition replacement is valid because Integer#div always rounds
+     * towards negative infinity.
+     */
+    while (mid = rb_funcall(rb_funcall(high, '+', 1, low), id_div, 1, INT2FIX(2)),
+           rb_cmpint(rb_funcall(low, id_cmp, 1, mid), low, mid) < 0) {
         BSEARCH_CHECK(mid);
         if (smaller) {
             high = mid;
         }
         else {
-            low = rb_funcall(mid, '+', 1, INT2FIX(1));
+            low = mid;
         }
     }
-    if (rb_equal(low, org_high)) {
-        BSEARCH_CHECK(low);
-        if (!smaller) return Qnil;
-    }
     return satisfied;
 }
 
@@ -696,8 +699,14 @@ range_bsearch(VALUE range)
      * by the mantissa. This is true with or without implicit bit.
      *
      * Finding the average of two ints needs to be careful about
-     * potential overflow (since float to long can use 64 bits)
+     * potential overflow (since float to long can use 64 bits).
-     * as well as the fact that -1/2 can be 0 or -1 in C89.
+     *
+     * The half-open interval (low, high] indicates where the target is located.
+     * The loop continues until low and high are adjacent.
+     *
+     * -1/2 can be either 0 or -1 in C89. However, when low and high are not adjacent,
+     * the rounding direction of mid = (low + high) / 2 does not affect the result of
+     * the binary search.
      *
      * Note that -0.0 is mapped to the same int as 0.0 as we don't want
      * (-1...0.0).bsearch to yield -0.0.
@@ -706,23 +715,19 @@ range_bsearch(VALUE range)
 #define BSEARCH(conv, excl) \
     do { \
         RETURN_ENUMERATOR(range, 0, 0); \
-        if (excl) high--; \
+        if (!(excl)) high++; \
-        org_high = high; \
+        low--; \
-        while (low < high) { \
+        while (low + 1 < high) { \
             mid = ((high < 0) == (low < 0)) ? low + ((high - low) / 2) \
-                : (low < -high) ? -((-1 - low - high)/2 + 1) : (low + high) / 2; \
+                : (low + high) / 2; \
             BSEARCH_CHECK(conv(mid)); \
             if (smaller) { \
                 high = mid; \
             } \
             else { \
-                low = mid + 1; \
+                low = mid; \
             } \
         } \
-        if (low == org_high) { \
-            BSEARCH_CHECK(conv(low)); \
-            if (!smaller) return Qnil; \
-        } \
         return satisfied; \
     } while (0)
 
@@ -730,7 +735,7 @@ range_bsearch(VALUE range)
     do { \
         long low = FIX2LONG(beg); \
         long high = FIX2LONG(end); \
-        long mid, org_high; \
+        long mid; \
         BSEARCH(INT2FIX, (excl)); \
     } while (0)
 
@@ -744,7 +749,7 @@ range_bsearch(VALUE range)
     else if (RB_FLOAT_TYPE_P(beg) || RB_FLOAT_TYPE_P(end)) {
         int64_t low  = double_as_int64(NIL_P(beg) ? -HUGE_VAL : RFLOAT_VALUE(rb_Float(beg)));
         int64_t high = double_as_int64(NIL_P(end) ?  HUGE_VAL : RFLOAT_VALUE(rb_Float(end)));
-        int64_t mid, org_high;
+        int64_t mid;
         BSEARCH(int64_as_double_to_num, EXCL(range));
     }
 #endif