Fix memoization for the /(...){0}/
case (#13169)
In this case, the previous implementation counted an extra number of opcodes to cache and the matching was unstable on memoization. This patch is to fix that problem by not counting an number of opcodes to cache in the parentheses of `(...){0}`.
This commit is contained in:
parent
5113869f5d
commit
18f8c514ea
Notes:
git
2025-04-24 12:03:40 +00:00
Merged-By: makenowjust <make.just.on@gmail.com>
21
regexec.c
21
regexec.c
@ -400,6 +400,13 @@ static OnigPosition count_num_cache_opcodes_inner(
|
||||
}
|
||||
GET_MEMNUM_INC(repeat_mem, p);
|
||||
p += SIZE_RELADDR;
|
||||
if (reg->repeat_range[repeat_mem].lower == 0 && reg->repeat_range[repeat_mem].upper == 0) {
|
||||
long dummy_num_cache_opcodes = 0;
|
||||
result = count_num_cache_opcodes_inner(reg, repeat_mem, lookaround_nesting, &p, &dummy_num_cache_opcodes);
|
||||
if (result < 0 || dummy_num_cache_opcodes < 0) {
|
||||
goto fail;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (reg->repeat_range[repeat_mem].lower == 0) {
|
||||
num_cache_opcodes++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -407,7 +414,6 @@ static OnigPosition count_num_cache_opcodes_inner(
|
||||
if (result < 0 || num_cache_opcodes < 0) {
|
||||
goto fail;
|
||||
}
|
||||
{
|
||||
OnigRepeatRange *repeat_range = ®->repeat_range[repeat_mem];
|
||||
if (repeat_range->lower < repeat_range->upper) {
|
||||
num_cache_opcodes++;
|
||||
@ -565,7 +571,7 @@ init_cache_opcodes_inner(
|
||||
OnigCacheOpcode *cache_opcodes = *cache_opcodes_ptr;
|
||||
OnigPosition result;
|
||||
|
||||
# define INC_CACHE_OPCODES do {\
|
||||
# define INC_CACHE_OPCODES if (cache_opcodes != NULL) {\
|
||||
cache_opcodes->addr = pbegin;\
|
||||
cache_opcodes->cache_point = cache_point;\
|
||||
cache_opcodes->outer_repeat_mem = current_repeat_mem;\
|
||||
@ -575,7 +581,7 @@ init_cache_opcodes_inner(
|
||||
cache_opcodes->match_addr = NULL;\
|
||||
cache_point += lookaround_nesting != 0 ? 2 : 1;\
|
||||
cache_opcodes++;\
|
||||
} while (0)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
while (p < pend) {
|
||||
pbegin = p;
|
||||
@ -706,6 +712,14 @@ init_cache_opcodes_inner(
|
||||
case OP_REPEAT_NG:
|
||||
GET_MEMNUM_INC(repeat_mem, p);
|
||||
p += SIZE_RELADDR;
|
||||
if (reg->repeat_range[repeat_mem].lower == 0 && reg->repeat_range[repeat_mem].upper == 0) {
|
||||
long dummy_num_cache_points = 0;
|
||||
OnigCacheOpcode* dummy_cache_opcodes = NULL;
|
||||
result = init_cache_opcodes_inner(reg, repeat_mem, lookaround_nesting, &dummy_cache_opcodes, &p, &dummy_num_cache_points);
|
||||
if (result != 0) {
|
||||
goto fail;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (reg->repeat_range[repeat_mem].lower == 0) {
|
||||
INC_CACHE_OPCODES;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -729,6 +743,7 @@ init_cache_opcodes_inner(
|
||||
cache_opcodes_in_repeat->num_cache_points_in_outer_repeat = num_cache_points_in_repeat;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case OP_REPEAT_INC:
|
||||
case OP_REPEAT_INC_NG:
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user