The fix [*] means this already passes on dev; and the belated pick to 6.8 should get there before this does (it landed before 6.9, so did not need picked there). [*] commit 5d656e5085303bd427a4e8564818c65ec1d0ac26 On 6.8, without the fix, the ISODate test passes (that's handled by a sui generis parser) but all three of the fromStringFormat tests of QDate, and the QDatetime exact reproducer from the bug report, provoke assertion failures. Task-number: QTBUG-135382 Pick-to: 6.8 Change-Id: I303df9215873e37a9f2cbf5a78aab8ffa48f67aa Reviewed-by: Albert Astals Cid <aacid@kde.org> (cherry picked from commit 79a1986e86243e94e8558ab5805a75b424916c89) Reviewed-by: Qt Cherry-pick Bot <cherrypick_bot@qt-project.org>
…
Description
Languages
C++
84.3%
HTML
4.9%
C
3.9%
CMake
3.6%
Objective-C++
2%
Other
0.8%