ae5dd04b5a
It's unclear¹ whether static zero-initialization of a static QBasicAtomic actually initializes the object with a zero value, or whether it remains default-constructed (without a value until a following call to std::atomic_init gives it one). Play it safe and use Q_BASIC_ATOMIC_INITIALIZER(0) to dodge any issues the old code may have had. ¹ see ongoing discussion on the Jira ticket Amends 04d6495bf773a6bb0d4fa6980df22d3b81a605b0. Task-number: QTBUG-137465 Pick-to: 6.8 6.5 Change-Id: Iee0d75ce10a589390afdd9069b7040a1c9c608e1 Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com> (cherry picked from commit e4b0549a4c3f55828488fad6e6f5723072d6a291) Reviewed-by: Qt Cherry-pick Bot <cherrypick_bot@qt-project.org> (cherry picked from commit 6b77b43b1a231dc0aafad15fb3220e86c6787eea)