According to QUIP-18 [1], all tests file should be
LicenseRef-Qt-Commercial OR GPL-3.0-only
[1]: https://contribute.qt-project.org/quips/18
Pick-to: 6.7
Task-number: QTBUG-121787
Change-Id: I9657df5d660820e56c96d511ea49d321c54682e8
Reviewed-by: Christian Ehrlicher <ch.ehrlicher@gmx.de>
Add more tests on WebAssembly platform for better tests coverage.
Change-Id: Iaaaa824ae6058a9ae5dba4c4038a7f687bfc17e0
Reviewed-by: Mikołaj Boc <Mikolaj.Boc@qt.io>
Replace the current license disclaimer in files by
a SPDX-License-Identifier.
Files that have to be modified by hand are modified.
License files are organized under LICENSES directory.
Task-number: QTBUG-67283
Change-Id: Id880c92784c40f3bbde861c0d93f58151c18b9f1
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Jörg Bornemann <joerg.bornemann@qt.io>
Complete search and replace of QtTest and QtTest/QtTest with QTest, as
QtTest includes the whole module. Replace all such instances with
correct header includes. See Jira task for more discussion.
Fixes: QTBUG-88831
Change-Id: I981cfae18a1cabcabcabee376016b086d9d01f44
Pick-to: 6.0
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
cborlargedatavalidation.cpp:93:60: warning: format ‘%llx’ expects argument of type ‘long long unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘qsizetype’ {aka ‘int’} [-Wformat=]
93 | QTest::addRow("bytearray-too-big-for-qbytearray-%llx", v)
| ~~~^ ~
| | |
| | qsizetype {aka int}
| long long unsigned int
| %x
The cast to size_t is required to make the 64-bit not complain due to
the long vs long long difference.
Pick-to: 5.15 6.0
Change-Id: I00b01c01a66748508ea1fffd164a9add2a2650cf
Reviewed-by: Allan Sandfeld Jensen <allan.jensen@qt.io>
Because CBOR strings are encoded in UTF-8, it's possible that the string
that won't fit a QString in UTF-16 would still fit QByteArray in UTF-8
(e.g., anything US-ASCII and most Latin text).
The previous solution was an improvement because we used to read into a
QByteArray then convert the QByteArray to QString, thus using 3x the
amount of memory (1x in QByteArray, 2x in QString). The previous commit
skipped the middle allocation and made the regular readString() function
do the decoding either directly on source memory or by reading in small
chunks (16 kB).
Future improvement for Qt 6.1: add readStringChunk(char16_t *, qsizetype)
so we can do the validation / skipping at O(1) memory.
Pick-to: 5.15 6.0
Change-Id: I7b9b97ae9b32412abdc6fffd1645458c655cc566
Reviewed-by: Allan Sandfeld Jensen <allan.jensen@qt.io>
Similar to the previous commit which applied to QCborStreamReader, don't
allocate too much data before checking that the stream actually has that
much.
Pick-to: 5.15 6.0
Fixes: QTBUG-88256
Change-Id: I7b9b97ae9b32412abdc6fffd16454b7568a063ba
Reviewed-by: Allan Sandfeld Jensen <allan.jensen@qt.io>
By calling the internal readStringChunk() function with a QByteArray
pointer, QCborStreamReader::readByteArray() can now avoid allocating the
resulting buffer until the internals have confirmed that there is
sufficient data in the incoming buffer. As a result, we first detect the
EOF condition before we conclude the payload would have been too big for
QByteArray (validation()) test. Meanwhile, the hugeDeviceValidation()
test ends up with a few conditions where it would have copied 1 GB of
data, so limit that too.
We make a choice of reporting OOM vs DataTooLarge only if QByteArray
fails to allocate in the first place (QByteArray::resize() ->
Q_CHECK_PTR -> qBadAlloc, QtCore is always built with exceptions on).
The QCborValue unit test needed a temporary work around until we apply
the same allocation fix (see next commit).
Pick-to: 5.15 6.0
Fixes: QTBUG-88253
Change-Id: I7b9b97ae9b32412abdc6fffd164523eeae49cdfe
Reviewed-by: Allan Sandfeld Jensen <allan.jensen@qt.io>
We checked against integer overflow, but not against overflowing the
QByteArray size limit. That caused a std::bad_alloc to be thrown, which
is bad when decoding unknown data. QCborStreamReader wasn't affected,
since it doesn't merge chunks.
Change-Id: I99ab0f318b1c43b89888fffd160c36f495fada87
Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io>
QByteArray doesn't like it.
Apply the same protection to QString, which we know uses the same
backend but uses elements twice as big. That means it can contain
slightly more than half as many elements, but exact half will suffice
for our needs.
Change-Id: Iaa63461109844e978376fffd15f9d4c7a9137856
Reviewed-by: Edward Welbourne <edward.welbourne@qt.io>
