Improve unicodeForDigit()'s comments
I'd typo'd the Suzhou one-digit. Record that our CLDR scanner verifies this is the only number system with non-contiguous digits, rather than merely recording a (now old) CLDR version in which that was true. Change-Id: I6f5b5d1f0a5aa1cd0557f62f296777b90b603087 Reviewed-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6705707088
commit
2b093450c3
@ -99,10 +99,11 @@ template <typename UcsInt>
|
||||
if (!digit)
|
||||
return zero;
|
||||
|
||||
// See QTBUG-85409: Suzhou's digits are U+3007, U+2021, ..., U+3029
|
||||
// See QTBUG-85409: Suzhou's digits are U+3007, U+3021, ..., U+3029
|
||||
if (zero == u'\u3007')
|
||||
return u'\u3020' + digit;
|
||||
// At CLDR 36.1, no other number system's digits were discontinuous.
|
||||
// In util/locale_database/ldml.py, LocaleScanner.numericData() asserts no
|
||||
// other number system in CLDR has discontinuous digits.
|
||||
|
||||
return zero + digit;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user