doc: replace _WG_ with _team_

AFAICT, there is no N-API Working Group. There *is* an N-API team, but
AFAIK there is no charter etc. (And if I'm wrong and there is, then
https://nodejs.org/en/about/working-groups/ needs an update!)

PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/22183
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Rich Trott 2018-08-07 16:23:39 -07:00
parent cf3bb593de
commit fcb46a4626

View File

@ -23,9 +23,9 @@ N-API API.
* There **should** be at least one test case per interesting use of the API.
* There **should** be a sample provided that operates in a realistic way
(operating how a real addon would be written).
* A new API **should** be discussed at the N-API working group meeting.
* A new API **should** be discussed at the N-API team meeting.
* A new API addition **must** be signed off by at least two members of
the N-API WG.
the N-API team.
* A new API addition **should** be simultaneously implemented in at least
one other VM implementation of Node.js.
* A new API **must** be considered experimental for at least one minor
@ -39,8 +39,7 @@ N-API API.
following:
* A new PR **must** be opened in `nodejs/node` to remove experimental
status. This PR **must** be tagged as **n-api** and **semver-minor**.
* Exiting an API from experimental **must** be signed off by the
working group.
* Exiting an API from experimental **must** be signed off by the team.
* If a backport is merited, an API **must** have a down-level
implementation.
* The API **should** be used by a published real-world module. Use of