doc: remove redundant LTS/Current information in Collaborator Guide
Remove bullet points about how breaking changes are handled in Current and LTS branches. * This information is covered in https://github.com/nodejs/Release#release-plan. * Having it here and in the above link means that the two may get out of sync, resulting in confusion. * The above link appears later in the doc in the LTS section. * Most Collaborators should not land *anything* in LTS branches and will almost never have a reason to land things into Current branches. They land stuff on the master branch. Adding this material here is confusing because it implies that Collaborators do land stuff on those branches. Save talk about those branches and how they're managed for later in the LTS section where it can be made clear that most Collaborators should not be landing code there anyway. PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/25842 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8198ca0b26
commit
28c0f84a69
@ -278,14 +278,6 @@ providing a Public API in such cases.
|
||||
|
||||
#### When Breaking Changes Actually Break Things
|
||||
|
||||
* Breaking changes should *never* land in Current or LTS except when:
|
||||
* Resolving critical security issues.
|
||||
* Fixing a critical bug (e.g. fixing a memory leak) requires a breaking
|
||||
change.
|
||||
* If a breaking commit does accidentally land in a Current or LTS branch, an
|
||||
attempt to fix the issue will be made before the next release; If no fix is
|
||||
provided then the commit will be reverted.
|
||||
|
||||
When any changes are landed on the master branch and it is determined that the
|
||||
changes *do* break existing code, a decision may be made to revert those
|
||||
changes either temporarily or permanently. However, the decision to revert or
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user