MEDIUM: thread: reimplement first numa node detection
Let's reimplement automatic binding to the first NUMA node when thread count is not forced. It's the same thing as is already done in check_config_validity() except that this time it's based on the collected CPU information. The threads are automatically counted and CPUs from non-first node(s) are evicted.
This commit is contained in:
parent
4a525e8d27
commit
e3aef4c9a4
37
src/thread.c
37
src/thread.c
@ -1614,6 +1614,43 @@ void thread_detect_count(void)
|
||||
* on the same cluster _capacity_ up to thr_max.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
/* Let's implement here the automatic binding to the first available
|
||||
* NUMA node when thread count is not set, taskset is not used and
|
||||
* no cpu-map directive is present.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
if (global.numa_cpu_mapping && !global.nbthread && !cpu_mask_forced && !cpu_map_configured()) {
|
||||
int first_node_id = -1;
|
||||
int second_node_id = -1;
|
||||
int cpu_count = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* determine first node with usable CPUs */
|
||||
for (cpu = 0; cpu <= cpu_topo_lastcpu; cpu++) {
|
||||
if (ha_cpu_topo[cpu].st & HA_CPU_F_EXCL_MASK)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if (ha_cpu_topo[cpu].no_id >= 0) {
|
||||
if (first_node_id < 0)
|
||||
first_node_id = ha_cpu_topo[cpu].no_id;
|
||||
else {
|
||||
second_node_id = ha_cpu_topo[cpu].no_id;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (second_node_id >= 0) {
|
||||
/* ignore all CPUs of other nodes, and count them */
|
||||
for (cpu = 0; cpu <= cpu_topo_lastcpu; cpu++) {
|
||||
if (ha_cpu_topo[cpu].no_id != first_node_id)
|
||||
ha_cpu_topo[cpu].st |= HA_CPU_F_IGNORED;
|
||||
else if (!(ha_cpu_topo[cpu].st & HA_CPU_F_EXCL_MASK))
|
||||
cpu_count++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
ha_diag_warning("Multi-socket cpu detected, automatically binding on active CPUs of '%d' (%u active cpu(s))\n", first_node_id, cpu_count);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!ha_cpuset_count(&cpu_map[0].thread[0])) {
|
||||
/* thread 1 is not mapped, no policy was applied, so we have to
|
||||
* count the threads ourselves.
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user