MDEV-10649: Optimizer sometimes use "index" instead of "range" access for UPDATE
(Fixing both InnoDB and XtraDB) Re-opening a TABLE object (after e.g. FLUSH TABLES or open table cache eviction) causes ha_innobase to call dict_stats_update(DICT_STATS_FETCH_ONLY_IF_NOT_IN_MEMORY). Inside this call, the following is done: dict_stats_empty_table(table); dict_stats_copy(table, t); On the other hand, commands like UPDATE make this call to get the "rows in table" statistics in table->stats.records: ha_innobase->info(HA_STATUS_VARIABLE|HA_STATUS_NO_LOCK) note the HA_STATUS_NO_LOCK parameter. It means, no locks are taken by ::info() If the ::info() call happens between dict_stats_empty_table and dict_stats_copy calls, the UPDATE's optimizer will get an estimate of table->stats.records=1, which causes it to pick a full table scan, which in turn will take a lot of row locks and cause other bad consequences.
This commit is contained in:
parent
5bbe929d70
commit
a53f3c6d3c
@ -673,7 +673,10 @@ void
|
||||
dict_stats_copy(
|
||||
/*============*/
|
||||
dict_table_t* dst, /*!< in/out: destination table */
|
||||
const dict_table_t* src) /*!< in: source table */
|
||||
const dict_table_t* src, /*!< in: source table */
|
||||
bool reset_ignored_indexes) /*!< in: if true, set ignored indexes
|
||||
to have the same statistics as if
|
||||
the table was empty */
|
||||
{
|
||||
dst->stats_last_recalc = src->stats_last_recalc;
|
||||
dst->stat_n_rows = src->stat_n_rows;
|
||||
@ -692,7 +695,16 @@ dict_stats_copy(
|
||||
&& (src_idx = dict_table_get_next_index(src_idx)))) {
|
||||
|
||||
if (dict_stats_should_ignore_index(dst_idx)) {
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
if (reset_ignored_indexes) {
|
||||
/* Reset index statistics for all ignored indexes,
|
||||
unless they are FT indexes (these have no statistics)*/
|
||||
if (dst_idx->type & DICT_FTS) {
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
dict_stats_empty_index(dst_idx);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ut_ad(!dict_index_is_univ(dst_idx));
|
||||
@ -782,7 +794,7 @@ dict_stats_snapshot_create(
|
||||
|
||||
t = dict_stats_table_clone_create(table);
|
||||
|
||||
dict_stats_copy(t, table);
|
||||
dict_stats_copy(t, table, false);
|
||||
|
||||
t->stat_persistent = table->stat_persistent;
|
||||
t->stats_auto_recalc = table->stats_auto_recalc;
|
||||
@ -3240,13 +3252,10 @@ dict_stats_update(
|
||||
|
||||
dict_table_stats_lock(table, RW_X_LATCH);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Initialize all stats to dummy values before
|
||||
copying because dict_stats_table_clone_create() does
|
||||
skip corrupted indexes so our dummy object 't' may
|
||||
have less indexes than the real object 'table'. */
|
||||
dict_stats_empty_table(table);
|
||||
|
||||
dict_stats_copy(table, t);
|
||||
/* Pass reset_ignored_indexes=true as parameter
|
||||
to dict_stats_copy. This will cause statictics
|
||||
for corrupted indexes to be set to empty values */
|
||||
dict_stats_copy(table, t, true);
|
||||
|
||||
dict_stats_assert_initialized(table);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -673,7 +673,10 @@ void
|
||||
dict_stats_copy(
|
||||
/*============*/
|
||||
dict_table_t* dst, /*!< in/out: destination table */
|
||||
const dict_table_t* src) /*!< in: source table */
|
||||
const dict_table_t* src, /*!< in: source table */
|
||||
bool reset_ignored_indexes) /*!< in: if true, set ignored indexes
|
||||
to have the same statistics as if
|
||||
the table was empty */
|
||||
{
|
||||
dst->stats_last_recalc = src->stats_last_recalc;
|
||||
dst->stat_n_rows = src->stat_n_rows;
|
||||
@ -692,7 +695,16 @@ dict_stats_copy(
|
||||
&& (src_idx = dict_table_get_next_index(src_idx)))) {
|
||||
|
||||
if (dict_stats_should_ignore_index(dst_idx)) {
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
if (reset_ignored_indexes) {
|
||||
/* Reset index statistics for all ignored indexes,
|
||||
unless they are FT indexes (these have no statistics)*/
|
||||
if (dst_idx->type & DICT_FTS) {
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
dict_stats_empty_index(dst_idx);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ut_ad(!dict_index_is_univ(dst_idx));
|
||||
@ -782,7 +794,7 @@ dict_stats_snapshot_create(
|
||||
|
||||
t = dict_stats_table_clone_create(table);
|
||||
|
||||
dict_stats_copy(t, table);
|
||||
dict_stats_copy(t, table, false);
|
||||
|
||||
t->stat_persistent = table->stat_persistent;
|
||||
t->stats_auto_recalc = table->stats_auto_recalc;
|
||||
@ -3240,13 +3252,10 @@ dict_stats_update(
|
||||
|
||||
dict_table_stats_lock(table, RW_X_LATCH);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Initialize all stats to dummy values before
|
||||
copying because dict_stats_table_clone_create() does
|
||||
skip corrupted indexes so our dummy object 't' may
|
||||
have less indexes than the real object 'table'. */
|
||||
dict_stats_empty_table(table);
|
||||
|
||||
dict_stats_copy(table, t);
|
||||
/* Pass reset_ignored_indexes=true as parameter
|
||||
to dict_stats_copy. This will cause statictics
|
||||
for corrupted indexes to be set to empty values */
|
||||
dict_stats_copy(table, t, true);
|
||||
|
||||
dict_stats_assert_initialized(table);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user