Bug#7879: Using TL_READ_NO_INSERT locks instead of TL_READ locks when
reading tables in "complex" SQL statements. If inserts happen in a table being read, the statements have no serialization order and the change can therefore not be reproduced on the slave. sql/sql_update.cc: Switching to using T_READ_NO_INSERT when the binlog is used. sql/sql_yacc.yy: Switching to using T_READ_NO_INSERT when the binlog is used.
This commit is contained in:
parent
04498c2a4f
commit
95dec435c2
@ -479,7 +479,10 @@ int mysql_multi_update(THD *thd,
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
DBUG_PRINT("info",("setting table `%s` for read-only", tl->alias));
|
||||
tl->lock_type= TL_READ;
|
||||
// If we are using the binary log, we need TL_READ_NO_INSERT to get
|
||||
// correct order of statements. Otherwise, we use a TL_READ lock to
|
||||
// improve performance.
|
||||
tl->lock_type= using_update_log ? TL_READ_NO_INSERT : TL_READ;
|
||||
tl->updating= 0;
|
||||
wants= SELECT_ACL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -822,7 +822,7 @@ create_select:
|
||||
SELECT_SYM
|
||||
{
|
||||
LEX *lex=Lex;
|
||||
lex->lock_option= (using_update_log) ? TL_READ_NO_INSERT : TL_READ;
|
||||
lex->lock_option= using_update_log ? TL_READ_NO_INSERT : TL_READ;
|
||||
if (lex->sql_command == SQLCOM_INSERT)
|
||||
lex->sql_command= SQLCOM_INSERT_SELECT;
|
||||
else if (lex->sql_command == SQLCOM_REPLACE)
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user