From 7b4cafe9b9357cfc6f080c55f1bafab5c01d7cf1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Hansson <martin.hansson@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:44:41 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Bug 11758558 - 50774: WRONG RESULTSET WHEN TIMESTAMP VALUES
 ARE APPENDED WITH .0

The bug was fixed by the patch for bug number BUG 11763109 - 55779: SELECT
DOES NOT WORK PROPERLY IN MYSQL SERVER VERSION "5.1.42 SUSE MYSQL (Exact same
fix as was proposed for this bug.) Since the motivation for the two bug
reports was completely different, however, it still makes sense to push the
test case.

This patch contains only the test case.
---
 mysql-test/r/type_timestamp.result | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 mysql-test/t/type_timestamp.test   | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 110 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mysql-test/r/type_timestamp.result b/mysql-test/r/type_timestamp.result
index e88d3462466..3176879343c 100644
--- a/mysql-test/r/type_timestamp.result
+++ b/mysql-test/r/type_timestamp.result
@@ -547,4 +547,67 @@ a
 2000-01-01 00:00:01
 2000-01-01 00:00:01
 DROP TABLE t1;
+#
+# Bug#50774: failed to get the correct resultset when timestamp values 
+# are appended with .0
+#
+CREATE TABLE t1 ( a TIMESTAMP, KEY ( a ) );
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES( '2010-02-01 09:31:01' );
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES( '2010-02-01 09:31:02' );
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES( '2010-02-01 09:31:03' );
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES( '2010-02-01 09:31:04' );
+SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a >= '2010-02-01 09:31:02.0';
+a
+2010-02-01 09:31:02
+2010-02-01 09:31:03
+2010-02-01 09:31:04
+SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE '2010-02-01 09:31:02.0' <= a;
+a
+2010-02-01 09:31:02
+2010-02-01 09:31:03
+2010-02-01 09:31:04
+SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a <= '2010-02-01 09:31:02.0';
+a
+2010-02-01 09:31:01
+2010-02-01 09:31:02
+SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE '2010-02-01 09:31:02.0' >= a;
+a
+2010-02-01 09:31:01
+2010-02-01 09:31:02
+EXPLAIN
+SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a >= '2010-02-01 09:31:02.0';
+id	select_type	table	type	possible_keys	key	key_len	ref	rows	Extra
+x	x	x	range	x	x	x	x	x	x
+SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a >= '2010-02-01 09:31:02.0';
+a
+2010-02-01 09:31:02
+2010-02-01 09:31:03
+2010-02-01 09:31:04
+CREATE TABLE t2 ( a TIMESTAMP, KEY ( a DESC ) );
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES( '2010-02-01 09:31:01' );
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES( '2010-02-01 09:31:02' );
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES( '2010-02-01 09:31:03' );
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES( '2010-02-01 09:31:04' );
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES( '2010-02-01 09:31:05' );
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES( '2010-02-01 09:31:06' );
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES( '2010-02-01 09:31:07' );
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES( '2010-02-01 09:31:08' );
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES( '2010-02-01 09:31:09' );
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES( '2010-02-01 09:31:10' );
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES( '2010-02-01 09:31:11' );
+# The bug would cause the range optimizer's comparison to use an open
+# interval here. This reveals itself only in the number of reads 
+# performed.
+FLUSH STATUS;
+EXPLAIN
+SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE a < '2010-02-01 09:31:02.0';
+id	select_type	table	type	possible_keys	key	key_len	ref	rows	Extra
+x	x	x	range	x	x	x	x	x	x
+SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE a < '2010-02-01 09:31:02.0';
+a
+2010-02-01 09:31:01
+SHOW STATUS LIKE 'Handler_read_next';
+Variable_name	Value
+Handler_read_next	1
+DROP TABLE t1, t2;
 End of 5.1 tests
diff --git a/mysql-test/t/type_timestamp.test b/mysql-test/t/type_timestamp.test
index 602f6f089c2..53b45fc6732 100644
--- a/mysql-test/t/type_timestamp.test
+++ b/mysql-test/t/type_timestamp.test
@@ -373,4 +373,51 @@ SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE a >= '20000101000000';
 
 DROP TABLE t1;
 
+--echo #
+--echo # Bug#50774: failed to get the correct resultset when timestamp values 
+--echo # are appended with .0
+--echo #
+CREATE TABLE t1 ( a TIMESTAMP, KEY ( a ) );
+
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES( '2010-02-01 09:31:01' );
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES( '2010-02-01 09:31:02' );
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES( '2010-02-01 09:31:03' );
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES( '2010-02-01 09:31:04' );
+
+SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a >= '2010-02-01 09:31:02.0';
+SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE '2010-02-01 09:31:02.0' <= a;
+SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a <= '2010-02-01 09:31:02.0';
+SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE '2010-02-01 09:31:02.0' >= a;
+
+--replace_column 1 x 2 x 3 x 5 x 6 x 7 x 8 x 9 x 10 x
+EXPLAIN
+SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a >= '2010-02-01 09:31:02.0';
+SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a >= '2010-02-01 09:31:02.0';
+
+CREATE TABLE t2 ( a TIMESTAMP, KEY ( a DESC ) );
+
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES( '2010-02-01 09:31:01' );
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES( '2010-02-01 09:31:02' );
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES( '2010-02-01 09:31:03' );
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES( '2010-02-01 09:31:04' );
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES( '2010-02-01 09:31:05' );
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES( '2010-02-01 09:31:06' );
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES( '2010-02-01 09:31:07' );
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES( '2010-02-01 09:31:08' );
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES( '2010-02-01 09:31:09' );
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES( '2010-02-01 09:31:10' );
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES( '2010-02-01 09:31:11' );
+
+--echo # The bug would cause the range optimizer's comparison to use an open
+--echo # interval here. This reveals itself only in the number of reads 
+--echo # performed.
+FLUSH STATUS;
+--replace_column 1 x 2 x 3 x 5 x 6 x 7 x 8 x 9 x 10 x
+EXPLAIN
+SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE a < '2010-02-01 09:31:02.0';
+SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE a < '2010-02-01 09:31:02.0';
+SHOW STATUS LIKE 'Handler_read_next';
+
+DROP TABLE t1, t2;
+
 --echo End of 5.1 tests