Fix for BUG#13127.

The problem was in the way table references are pre-filtered when
resolving a qualified field. When resolving qualified table references
we search recursively in the operands of the join. If there is
natural/using join with a merge view, the first call to find_field_in_table_ref
makes a recursive call to itself with the view as the new table reference
to search for the column. However the view has both nested_join and
join_columns != NULL so it skipped the test whether the view name matches
the field qualifier. As a result the field was found in the view since the
view already has a field with the same name. Thus the field was incorrectly
resolved as the view field.


mysql-test/r/select.result:
  Test for BUG#13127.
mysql-test/t/select.test:
  Test for BUG#13127.
sql/sql_base.cc:
  The patch contains two independent changes:
  
  - When searching for qualified fields, include merge views and information schema tables
  used with SHOW (both using TABLE_LIST::field_translation to represent result fields) in
  the test that compares the qualifying table with the name of the table reference being
  searched. This change fixes the bug.
  
  - Do not search the materialized list of columns of a NATURAL/USING join if 'table_list'
  is a stored table or merge view. Instead search directly in the table or view as if it
  is not under a natural join. This is a performance improvement since if 'table_list'
  is a stored table, then the search can utilize the name hash for table names.

mysql-test/r/select.result

@@ -2960,3 +2960,72 @@ x	x
 4	4
 4	5
 drop table t1,t2,t3;
+create table t1 (id char(16) not null default '', primary key  (id));
+insert into t1 values ('100'),('101'),('102');
+create table t2 (id char(16) default null);
+insert into t2 values (1);
+create view v1 as select t1.id from t1;
+create view v2 as select t2.id from t2;
+create view v3 as select (t1.id+2) as id from t1 natural left join t2;
+select t1.id from t1 left join v2 using (id);
+id
+100
+101
+102
+select t1.id from v2 right join t1 using (id);
+id
+100
+101
+102
+select t1.id from t1 left join v3 using (id);
+id
+100
+101
+102
+select * from t1 left join v2 using (id);
+id
+100
+101
+102
+select * from v2 right join t1 using (id);
+id
+100
+101
+102
+select * from t1 left join v3 using (id);
+id
+100
+101
+102
+select v1.id from v1 left join v2 using (id);
+id
+100
+101
+102
+select v1.id from v2 right join v1 using (id);
+id
+100
+101
+102
+select v1.id from v1 left join v3 using (id);
+id
+100
+101
+102
+select * from v1 left join v2 using (id);
+id
+100
+101
+102
+select * from v2 right join v1 using (id);
+id
+100
+101
+102
+select * from v1 left join v3 using (id);
+id
+100
+101
+102
+drop table t1, t2;
+drop view v1, v2, v3;

mysql-test/t/select.test

@@ -2535,3 +2535,33 @@ insert into t2 values (1, 1), (2, 1), (3, 3), (4, 6), (5, 6);
 insert into t3 values (1), (2), (3), (4), (5);
 select t1.x, t3.x from t1, t2, t3  where t1.x = t2.x and t3.x >= t1.y and t3.x <= t2.y;
 drop table t1,t2,t3;
+
+#
+# Bug #13127 LEFT JOIN against a VIEW returns NULL instead of correct value
+#
+
+create table t1 (id char(16) not null default '', primary key  (id));
+insert into t1 values ('100'),('101'),('102');
+create table t2 (id char(16) default null);
+insert into t2 values (1);
+create view v1 as select t1.id from t1;
+create view v2 as select t2.id from t2;
+create view v3 as select (t1.id+2) as id from t1 natural left join t2;
+
+# all queries must return the same result
+select t1.id from t1 left join v2 using (id);
+select t1.id from v2 right join t1 using (id);
+select t1.id from t1 left join v3 using (id);
+select * from t1 left join v2 using (id);
+select * from v2 right join t1 using (id);
+select * from t1 left join v3 using (id);
+
+select v1.id from v1 left join v2 using (id);
+select v1.id from v2 right join v1 using (id);
+select v1.id from v1 left join v3 using (id);
+select * from v1 left join v2 using (id);
+select * from v2 right join v1 using (id);
+select * from v1 left join v3 using (id);
+
+drop table t1, t2;
+drop view v1, v2, v3;

sql/sql_base.cc

@@ -2948,6 +2948,18 @@ find_field_in_table(THD *thd, TABLE *table, const char *name, uint length,
                                  belongs - differs from 'table_list' only for
                                  NATURAL_USING joins.
 
+  DESCRIPTION
+    Find a field in a table reference depending on the type of table
+    reference. There are three types of table references with respect
+    to the representation of their result columns:
+    - an array of Field_translator objects for MERGE views and some
+      information_schema tables,
+    - an array of Field objects (and possibly a name hash) for stored
+      tables,
+    - a list of Natural_join_column objects for NATURAL/USING joins.
+    This procedure detects the type of the table reference 'table_list'
+    and calls the corresponding search routine.
+
   RETURN
     0			field is not found
     view_ref_found	found value in VIEW (real result is in *ref)
@@ -2971,16 +2983,30 @@ find_field_in_table_ref(THD *thd, TABLE_LIST *table_list,
 
   /*
     Check that the table and database that qualify the current field name
-    are the same as the table we are going to search for the field.
+    are the same as the table reference we are going to search for the field.
-    This is done differently for NATURAL/USING joins or nested joins that
+
-    are operands of NATURAL/USING joins because there we can't simply
+    We exclude from the test below NATURAL/USING joins and any nested join
-    compare the qualifying table and database names with the ones of
+    that is an operand of NATURAL/USING join, because each column in such
-    'table_list' because each field in such a join may originate from a
+    joins may potentially originate from a different table. However, base
-    different table.
+    tables and views that are under some NATURAL/USING join are searched
+    as usual base tables/views.
+
+    We include explicitly table references with a 'field_translation' table,
+    because if there are views over natural joins we don't want to search
+    inside the view, but we want to search directly in the view columns
+    which are represented as a 'field_translation'.
+
     TODO: Ensure that table_name, db_name and tables->db always points to
           something !
   */
-  if (!(table_list->nested_join && table_list->join_columns) &&
+  if (/* Exclude natural joins and nested joins underlying natural joins. */
+      (!(table_list->nested_join && table_list->join_columns) ||
+       /* Include merge views and information schema tables. */
+       table_list->field_translation) &&
+      /*
+        Test if the field qualifiers match the table reference we plan
+        to search.
+      */
       table_name && table_name[0] &&
       (my_strcasecmp(table_alias_charset, table_list->alias, table_name) ||
        (db_name && db_name[0] && table_list->db && table_list->db[0] &&
@@ -2988,25 +3014,48 @@ find_field_in_table_ref(THD *thd, TABLE_LIST *table_list,
     DBUG_RETURN(0);
 
   *actual_table= NULL;
+
   if (table_list->field_translation)
   {
+    /* 'table_list' is a view or an information schema table. */
     if ((fld= find_field_in_view(thd, table_list, name, item_name, length,
                                  ref, check_grants_view,
                                  register_tree_change)))
       *actual_table= table_list;
   }
-  else if (table_list->nested_join && table_list->join_columns)
+  else if (!(table_list->nested_join && table_list->join_columns))
   {
     /*
-      If this is a NATURAL/USING join, or an operand of such join which is a
+      'table_list' is a stored table. It is so because the only type of nested
-      join itself, and the field name is qualified, then search for the field
+      join passed to this procedure is a NATURAL/USING join or an operand of a
-      in the operands of the join.
+      NATURAL/USING join.
+    */
+    if ((fld= find_field_in_table(thd, table_list->table, name, length,
+                                  check_grants_table, allow_rowid,
+                                  cached_field_index_ptr)))
+      *actual_table= table_list;
+#ifndef NO_EMBEDDED_ACCESS_CHECKS
+    /* check for views with temporary table algorithm */
+    if (check_grants_view && table_list->view &&
+        fld && fld != WRONG_GRANT &&
+        check_grant_column(thd, &table_list->grant,
+                           table_list->view_db.str,
+                           table_list->view_name.str,
+                           name, length))
+    fld= WRONG_GRANT;
+#endif
+  }
+  else
+  {
+    /*
+      'table_list' is a NATURAL/USING join, or an operand of such join that
+      is a nested join itself.
+
+      If the field name we search for is qualified, then search for the field
+      in the table references used by NATURAL/USING the join.
     */
     if (table_name && table_name[0])
     {
-      /*
-        Qualified field; Search for it in the tables used by the natural join.
-      */
       List_iterator<TABLE_LIST> it(table_list->nested_join->join_list);
       TABLE_LIST *table;
       while ((table= it++))
@@ -3032,23 +3081,6 @@ find_field_in_table_ref(THD *thd, TABLE_LIST *table_list,
                                     check_grants_table || check_grants_view,
                                     register_tree_change, actual_table);
   }
-  else
-  {
-    if ((fld= find_field_in_table(thd, table_list->table, name, length,
-                                  check_grants_table, allow_rowid,
-                                  cached_field_index_ptr)))
-      *actual_table= table_list;
-#ifndef NO_EMBEDDED_ACCESS_CHECKS
-    /* check for views with temporary table algorithm */
-    if (check_grants_view && table_list->view &&
-        fld && fld != WRONG_GRANT &&
-        check_grant_column(thd, &table_list->grant,
-                           table_list->view_db.str,
-                           table_list->view_name.str,
-                           name, length))
-    fld= WRONG_GRANT;
-#endif
-  }
 
   DBUG_RETURN(fld);
 }