BUG#39753: Replication failure on MIXED + bit + myisam + no PK
When using mixed mode the record values stored inside the storage engine differed from the ones computed from the row event. This happened because the prepare_record function was calling empty_record macro causing some don't care bits to be left set. Replacing the empty_record plus explicitly setting defaults with restore_record to restore the record default values fixes this.
This commit is contained in:
parent
abfe3437f7
commit
5833903889
32
mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_mixed_bit_pk.result
Normal file
32
mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_mixed_bit_pk.result
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
||||
stop slave;
|
||||
drop table if exists t1,t2,t3,t4,t5,t6,t7,t8,t9;
|
||||
reset master;
|
||||
reset slave;
|
||||
drop table if exists t1,t2,t3,t4,t5,t6,t7,t8,t9;
|
||||
start slave;
|
||||
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t1,t2,t3,t4,t5,t6,t7,t8;
|
||||
CREATE TABLE t1 (`bit_key` bit, `bit` bit, key (`bit_key` )) ENGINE=MyISAM;
|
||||
CREATE TABLE t2 (`bit_key` bit(4), `bit` bit, key (`bit_key` )) ENGINE=MyISAM;
|
||||
CREATE TABLE t3 (`bit_key` bit(7), `bit` bit, key (`bit_key` )) ENGINE=MyISAM;
|
||||
CREATE TABLE t4 (`bit_key` bit(8), `bit` bit, key (`bit_key` )) ENGINE=MyISAM;
|
||||
CREATE TABLE t5 (`bit_key` bit(9), `bit` bit, key (`bit_key` )) ENGINE=MyISAM;
|
||||
CREATE TABLE t6 (`bit_key` bit(14), `bit` bit, key (`bit_key` )) ENGINE=MyISAM;
|
||||
CREATE TABLE t7 (`bit_key` bit(15), `bit` bit, key (`bit_key` )) ENGINE=MyISAM;
|
||||
CREATE TABLE t8 (`bit_key` bit(16), `bit` bit, key (`bit_key` )) ENGINE=MyISAM;
|
||||
INSERT INTO `t1` ( `bit` ) VALUES ( 0 );
|
||||
DELETE FROM `t1` WHERE `bit` < 2 LIMIT 4;
|
||||
INSERT INTO `t2` ( `bit` ) VALUES ( 0 );
|
||||
DELETE FROM `t2` WHERE `bit` < 2 LIMIT 4;
|
||||
INSERT INTO `t3` ( `bit` ) VALUES ( 0 );
|
||||
DELETE FROM `t3` WHERE `bit` < 2 LIMIT 4;
|
||||
INSERT INTO `t4` ( `bit` ) VALUES ( 0 );
|
||||
DELETE FROM `t4` WHERE `bit` < 2 LIMIT 4;
|
||||
INSERT INTO `t5` ( `bit` ) VALUES ( 0 );
|
||||
DELETE FROM `t5` WHERE `bit` < 2 LIMIT 4;
|
||||
INSERT INTO `t6` ( `bit` ) VALUES ( 0 );
|
||||
DELETE FROM `t6` WHERE `bit` < 2 LIMIT 4;
|
||||
INSERT INTO `t7` ( `bit` ) VALUES ( 0 );
|
||||
DELETE FROM `t7` WHERE `bit` < 2 LIMIT 4;
|
||||
INSERT INTO `t8` ( `bit` ) VALUES ( 0 );
|
||||
DELETE FROM `t8` WHERE `bit` < 2 LIMIT 4;
|
||||
DROP TABLE t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8;
|
78
mysql-test/suite/rpl/t/rpl_mixed_bit_pk.test
Normal file
78
mysql-test/suite/rpl/t/rpl_mixed_bit_pk.test
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
|
||||
#
|
||||
# BUG
|
||||
# ---
|
||||
# BUG#39753: Replication failure on MIXED + bit + myisam + no PK
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Description
|
||||
# -----------
|
||||
# Simple statements against a bit column cause failure in mixed-mode
|
||||
# replication.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Implementation is as follows:
|
||||
# i) A table with two bit fields is created. One of them is a key.
|
||||
# ii) A record is inserted without specifying the key value.
|
||||
# iii) The record is deleted using a where clause that matches it.
|
||||
# iv) repeat i-iii) for bit key that has different size, generating
|
||||
# different extra bits values
|
||||
# v) The slave is synchronized with master
|
||||
# vi) The table is dropped on master and the slave is re-synchronized
|
||||
# with master.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Step v) made the bug evident before the patch, as the slave would
|
||||
# fail to find the correspondent row in its database (although it did
|
||||
# the insert in step ii) ).
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Obs
|
||||
# ---
|
||||
# This test is based on the "how to repeat" section from the bug report.
|
||||
#
|
||||
#
|
||||
|
||||
--source include/master-slave.inc
|
||||
|
||||
--disable_warnings
|
||||
# setup
|
||||
|
||||
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t1,t2,t3,t4,t5,t6,t7,t8;
|
||||
CREATE TABLE t1 (`bit_key` bit, `bit` bit, key (`bit_key` )) ENGINE=MyISAM;
|
||||
CREATE TABLE t2 (`bit_key` bit(4), `bit` bit, key (`bit_key` )) ENGINE=MyISAM;
|
||||
CREATE TABLE t3 (`bit_key` bit(7), `bit` bit, key (`bit_key` )) ENGINE=MyISAM;
|
||||
CREATE TABLE t4 (`bit_key` bit(8), `bit` bit, key (`bit_key` )) ENGINE=MyISAM;
|
||||
CREATE TABLE t5 (`bit_key` bit(9), `bit` bit, key (`bit_key` )) ENGINE=MyISAM;
|
||||
CREATE TABLE t6 (`bit_key` bit(14), `bit` bit, key (`bit_key` )) ENGINE=MyISAM;
|
||||
CREATE TABLE t7 (`bit_key` bit(15), `bit` bit, key (`bit_key` )) ENGINE=MyISAM;
|
||||
CREATE TABLE t8 (`bit_key` bit(16), `bit` bit, key (`bit_key` )) ENGINE=MyISAM;
|
||||
|
||||
# insert and delete
|
||||
INSERT INTO `t1` ( `bit` ) VALUES ( 0 );
|
||||
DELETE FROM `t1` WHERE `bit` < 2 LIMIT 4;
|
||||
|
||||
INSERT INTO `t2` ( `bit` ) VALUES ( 0 );
|
||||
DELETE FROM `t2` WHERE `bit` < 2 LIMIT 4;
|
||||
|
||||
INSERT INTO `t3` ( `bit` ) VALUES ( 0 );
|
||||
DELETE FROM `t3` WHERE `bit` < 2 LIMIT 4;
|
||||
|
||||
INSERT INTO `t4` ( `bit` ) VALUES ( 0 );
|
||||
DELETE FROM `t4` WHERE `bit` < 2 LIMIT 4;
|
||||
|
||||
INSERT INTO `t5` ( `bit` ) VALUES ( 0 );
|
||||
DELETE FROM `t5` WHERE `bit` < 2 LIMIT 4;
|
||||
|
||||
INSERT INTO `t6` ( `bit` ) VALUES ( 0 );
|
||||
DELETE FROM `t6` WHERE `bit` < 2 LIMIT 4;
|
||||
|
||||
INSERT INTO `t7` ( `bit` ) VALUES ( 0 );
|
||||
DELETE FROM `t7` WHERE `bit` < 2 LIMIT 4;
|
||||
|
||||
INSERT INTO `t8` ( `bit` ) VALUES ( 0 );
|
||||
DELETE FROM `t8` WHERE `bit` < 2 LIMIT 4;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
--enable_warnings
|
||||
sync_slave_with_master;
|
||||
|
||||
# clean up
|
||||
connection master;
|
||||
DROP TABLE t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8;
|
||||
sync_slave_with_master;
|
@ -297,21 +297,16 @@ unpack_row(Relay_log_info const *rli,
|
||||
/**
|
||||
Fills @c table->record[0] with default values.
|
||||
|
||||
First @c empty_record() is called and then, additionally, fields are
|
||||
initialized explicitly with a call to @c set_default().
|
||||
|
||||
For optimization reasons, the explicit initialization can be skipped for
|
||||
first @c skip fields. This is useful if later we are going to fill these
|
||||
fields from other source (e.g. from a Rows replication event).
|
||||
|
||||
If @c check is true, fields are explicitly initialized only if they have
|
||||
default value or can be NULL. Otherwise error is reported.
|
||||
First @c restore_record() is called to restore the default values for
|
||||
record concerning the given table. Then, if @c check is true,
|
||||
a check is performed to see if fields are have default value or can
|
||||
be NULL. Otherwise error is reported.
|
||||
|
||||
@param table Table whose record[0] buffer is prepared.
|
||||
@param skip Number of columns for which default value initialization
|
||||
@param skip Number of columns for which default/nullable check
|
||||
should be skipped.
|
||||
@param check Indicates if errors should be checked when setting default
|
||||
values.
|
||||
@param check Indicates if errors should be raised when checking
|
||||
default/nullable field properties.
|
||||
|
||||
@returns 0 on success or a handler level error code
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ -321,25 +316,28 @@ int prepare_record(TABLE *const table,
|
||||
DBUG_ENTER("prepare_record");
|
||||
|
||||
int error= 0;
|
||||
empty_record(table);
|
||||
restore_record(table, s->default_values);
|
||||
|
||||
if (skip >= table->s->fields) // nothing to do
|
||||
/*
|
||||
This skip should be revisited in 6.0, because in 6.0 RBR one
|
||||
can have holes in the row (as the grain of the writeset is
|
||||
the column and not the entire row).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (skip >= table->s->fields || !check)
|
||||
DBUG_RETURN(0);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Explicit initialization of fields */
|
||||
/* Checking if exists default/nullable fields in the default values. */
|
||||
|
||||
for (Field **field_ptr= table->field+skip ; *field_ptr ; ++field_ptr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
uint32 const mask= NOT_NULL_FLAG | NO_DEFAULT_VALUE_FLAG;
|
||||
Field *const f= *field_ptr;
|
||||
|
||||
if (check && ((f->flags & mask) == mask))
|
||||
if (((f->flags & mask) == mask))
|
||||
{
|
||||
my_error(ER_NO_DEFAULT_FOR_FIELD, MYF(0), f->field_name);
|
||||
error = HA_ERR_ROWS_EVENT_APPLY;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
f->set_default();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
DBUG_RETURN(error);
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user