diff --git a/mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_row_disabled_slave_key.result b/mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_row_disabled_slave_key.result new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..01e3dfd6508 --- /dev/null +++ b/mysql-test/suite/rpl/r/rpl_row_disabled_slave_key.result @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +stop slave; +drop table if exists t1,t2,t3,t4,t5,t6,t7,t8,t9; +reset master; +reset slave; +drop table if exists t1,t2,t3,t4,t5,t6,t7,t8,t9; +start slave; +SET SQL_LOG_BIN=0; +CREATE TABLE t (a int, b int, c int, key(b)); +SET SQL_LOG_BIN=1; +CREATE TABLE t (a int, b int, c int); +INSERT INTO t VALUES (1,2,4); +INSERT INTO t VALUES (4,3,4); +DELETE FROM t; +DROP TABLE t; +stop slave; +drop table if exists t1,t2,t3,t4,t5,t6,t7,t8,t9; +reset master; +reset slave; +drop table if exists t1,t2,t3,t4,t5,t6,t7,t8,t9; +start slave; +CREATE TABLE t (a int, b int, c int, key(b)); +ALTER TABLE t DISABLE KEYS; +INSERT INTO t VALUES (1,2,4); +INSERT INTO t VALUES (4,3,4); +DELETE FROM t; +DROP TABLE t; diff --git a/mysql-test/suite/rpl/t/rpl_row_disabled_slave_key.test b/mysql-test/suite/rpl/t/rpl_row_disabled_slave_key.test new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1d7e134f4f4 --- /dev/null +++ b/mysql-test/suite/rpl/t/rpl_row_disabled_slave_key.test @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ +# BUG#47312: RBR: Disabling key on slave breaks replication: +# HA_ERR_WRONG_INDEX +# +# Description +# =========== +# +# This test case checks whether disabling a key on a slave breaks +# replication or not. +# +# Case #1, shows that while not using ALTER TABLE... DISABLE KEYS and +# the slave has no key defined while the master has one, replication +# won't break. +# +# Case #2, shows that before patch for BUG#47312, if defining key on +# slave table, and later disable it, replication would break. This +# has been fixed. +# + +-- source include/master-slave.inc +-- source include/have_binlog_format_row.inc + +# +# Case #1: master has key, but slave has not. +# Replication does not break. +# + +SET SQL_LOG_BIN=0; +CREATE TABLE t (a int, b int, c int, key(b)); +SET SQL_LOG_BIN=1; + +-- connection slave + +CREATE TABLE t (a int, b int, c int); + +-- connection master + +INSERT INTO t VALUES (1,2,4); +INSERT INTO t VALUES (4,3,4); +DELETE FROM t; + +-- sync_slave_with_master + +-- connection master +DROP TABLE t; + +-- sync_slave_with_master + +# +# Case #2: master has key, slave also has one, +# but it gets disabled sometime. +# Replication does not break anymore. +# +-- source include/master-slave-reset.inc +-- connection master + +CREATE TABLE t (a int, b int, c int, key(b)); + +-- sync_slave_with_master + +ALTER TABLE t DISABLE KEYS; + +-- connection master + +INSERT INTO t VALUES (1,2,4); +INSERT INTO t VALUES (4,3,4); +DELETE FROM t; + +-- sync_slave_with_master + +-- connection master +DROP TABLE t; + +-- sync_slave_with_master diff --git a/sql/log_event.cc b/sql/log_event.cc index 08fe3aba8ed..3c584011bfb 100644 --- a/sql/log_event.cc +++ b/sql/log_event.cc @@ -8835,11 +8835,11 @@ int Rows_log_event::find_row(const Relay_log_info *rli) */ store_record(table,record[1]); - if (table->s->keys > 0) + if (table->s->keys > 0 && table->s->keys_in_use.is_set(0)) { DBUG_PRINT("info",("locating record using primary key (index_read)")); - /* We have a key: search the table using the index */ + /* The 0th key is active: search the table using the index */ if (!table->file->inited && (error= table->file->ha_index_init(0, FALSE))) { DBUG_PRINT("info",("ha_index_init returns error %d",error));