From 03854a84abf71c734f7a1c49897e3ef010a3fe4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vladislav Vaintroub <vvaintroub@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 22:26:12 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] MDEV-32374 Improve lsn_lock. Also use futex-like on Windows

Upon further benchmarking, it turns out srw_mutex performs overall
slightly better with WaitOnAddress than CRITICAL_SECTION.
---
 storage/innobase/include/log0log.h | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/storage/innobase/include/log0log.h b/storage/innobase/include/log0log.h
index 58213856c79..54851ca0a65 100644
--- a/storage/innobase/include/log0log.h
+++ b/storage/innobase/include/log0log.h
@@ -180,9 +180,6 @@ private:
   /* On ARM, we do more spinning */
   typedef srw_spin_lock log_rwlock;
   typedef pthread_mutex_wrapper<true> log_lsn_lock;
-#elif defined _WIN32
-  typedef srw_lock log_rwlock;
-  typedef pthread_mutex_wrapper<false> log_lsn_lock;
 #else
   typedef srw_lock log_rwlock;
   typedef srw_mutex log_lsn_lock;